# What is the logic behind using separate erizoJS process for each publisher

**URL:** <https://discourse.lynckia.com/t/what-is-the-logic-behind-using-separate-erizojs-process-for-each-publisher/97>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [September 21, 2015, 9:06am UTC](https://discourse.lynckia.com/t/what-is-the-logic-behind-using-separate-erizojs-process-for-each-publisher/97 "2015-09-21T09:06:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ajith\_reddy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/5e9695/32.png) [@ajith\_reddy](https://discourse.lynckia.com/u/ajith_reddy)\
**Post date:** [September 21, 2015, 9:06am UTC](https://discourse.lynckia.com/t/what-is-the-logic-behind-using-separate-erizojs-process-for-each-publisher/97/1 "2015-09-21T09:06:33Z")

</div>

Referring to : [http://lynckia.com/licode/async.html](http://lynckia.com/licode/async.html)  
It seems that the article says that licode will launch a new process for  
each publisher. Isn’t this an overkill. So for 50 publishers, I will have  
50 processes which is a kind of overkill. I am not sure if I am missing  
something here. Please enlighten me about this.